Rules
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:35 pm
13. We will be picking at random 5 teams to be mediators with 5 additional teams as alternates prior to the start of the tournament by team number. In the case of team with any coyotes that are disqualified during the check-ins the team with the rules infraction will have an opportunity on Saturday after check-ins are complete to request a review by their peers of the facts as they pertain to the coyotes in question. One member of each of the 5 teams will have a vote with a majority vote being the final ruling The team that requests the review will have to upon the request pay an additional $75 that will be refunded back if upon the review the ruling is overturned. If the ruling stands the money will be forfeited by the team requesting the review. This is not an opportunity to rewrite rules but a chance at a impartial review of the facts.
I would like to see some input on this change. This was suggested by Brad Troftgruben and his brother Corey Troftgruben. I feel this is a great idea but I want to hear what everyone else thinks and we can maybe work through some problems if any prior to implementing this addition to the rules at the Classic. If this works out I will be adding this to my other tournaments as well.
I would like to see some input on this change. This was suggested by Brad Troftgruben and his brother Corey Troftgruben. I feel this is a great idea but I want to hear what everyone else thinks and we can maybe work through some problems if any prior to implementing this addition to the rules at the Classic. If this works out I will be adding this to my other tournaments as well.